<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Open System for Geniuses - by Chronostalker Comments</title>
	<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Philosophy, Physics and Metaphysics of Open Systems</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Sarfatti</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/04/22/what-the-bleep-do-we-know-part-1/#comment-73</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 03:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/04/22/what-the-bleep-do-we-know-part-1/#comment-73</guid>
					<description>See my three books on all this. Start with
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>See my three books on all this. Start with<br />
<a href='http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999' rel='nofollow'>http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kerri</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-68</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 01:31:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-68</guid>
					<description>It would be a stretch to call Lubos Motl a genius - a nut case would be closer to the point. Just look at his review of Lee Smolins book &quot; The Trouble With Physics&quot; posted on his blog. His review states that it is a weird book, full of non-sense that made him very angry. And now Lubos Motl and his motley crew of cohorts will have to find a new theory of nothing, that is mathematically elegant. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It would be a stretch to call Lubos Motl a genius - a nut case would be closer to the point. Just look at his review of Lee Smolins book &#8221; The Trouble With Physics&#8221; posted on his blog. His review states that it is a weird book, full of non-sense that made him very angry. And now Lubos Motl and his motley crew of cohorts will have to find a new theory of nothing, that is mathematically elegant.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexander Putney</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-66</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:29:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-66</guid>
					<description>Well, more than a year later, I am back to follow-up with my URL which is growing still and will have a spanish mirror site shortly:

www.humanresonance.org

The pure math breakthrough here is found in the synchronicity of prime numbers in the Fibonacci sequence and how this has been applied in the geopositions of the pyramids of the world (www.humanresonance.org/phi.html).

I welcome all comments on my site, and will get the contact email provided there into operation shortly...

Alexander Putney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, more than a year later, I am back to follow-up with my URL which is growing still and will have a spanish mirror site shortly:</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.humanresonance.org' rel='nofollow'>www.humanresonance.org</a></p>
	<p>The pure math breakthrough here is found in the synchronicity of prime numbers in the Fibonacci sequence and how this has been applied in the geopositions of the pyramids of the world (www.humanresonance.org/phi.html).</p>
	<p>I welcome all comments on my site, and will get the contact email provided there into operation shortly&#8230;</p>
	<p>Alexander Putney
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Benjamin J. Brown</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2006/06/01/jeff-rense-a-compulsive-liar/#comment-65</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:56:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2006/06/01/jeff-rense-a-compulsive-liar/#comment-65</guid>
					<description>I have been reading the nonsense that Rense et. al have been putting on their website for a copule of years now.  I live in Grants Pass, Oregon where the clandestine subliminal laboratory have used the internet, and Rense in particuliar, to cyber stalk me.  I find it quite odd that the Rense forum, as it exists here in GP, only has 4 or 5 posters.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have been reading the nonsense that Rense et. al have been putting on their website for a copule of years now.  I live in Grants Pass, Oregon where the clandestine subliminal laboratory have used the internet, and Rense in particuliar, to cyber stalk me.  I find it quite odd that the Rense forum, as it exists here in GP, only has 4 or 5 posters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Sarfatti</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/02/26/destiny-matrix/#comment-63</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:56:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/02/26/destiny-matrix/#comment-63</guid>
					<description>Excellent! BTW Discussion forum on http://stardrive.org is more up to date than is my blog Destiny Matrix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Excellent! BTW Discussion forum on <a href='http://stardrive.org' rel='nofollow'>http://stardrive.org</a> is more up to date than is my blog Destiny Matrix.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doc</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-50</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-50</guid>
					<description>
What is Alexander Putney's web address?  He said his web was going up soon, but I was unable to find it, more than five months later.

Thanks.

Doc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What is Alexander Putney&#8217;s web address?  He said his web was going up soon, but I was unable to find it, more than five months later.</p>
	<p>Thanks.</p>
	<p>Doc
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rasmus</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-49</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-49</guid>
					<description>I have had similar thoughts about the Lubos, who likened me to the pope (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/12/temperatures-autocorrelation.html). He has teamed up with climate-sceptic Steve McIntyre and is apparently not very impressed by the RealClimate.org blog (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_motls_archive.html), and one of my posts on this blog prompted his response on autocorrelation. His response shows that he mixes up uncertainties associated with quantum states and non-linear chaos. He also is not able to see why using the very same data for creating models to derive a null-distribution and then use this null-distribution to test a hypothesis easily can involve circulat reasoning.I'm not impressed by this Lubos guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have had similar thoughts about the Lubos, who likened me to the pope (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/12/temperatures-autocorrelation.html). He has teamed up with climate-sceptic Steve McIntyre and is apparently not very impressed by the RealClimate.org blog (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_motls_archive.html), and one of my posts on this blog prompted his response on autocorrelation. His response shows that he mixes up uncertainties associated with quantum states and non-linear chaos. He also is not able to see why using the very same data for creating models to derive a null-distribution and then use this null-distribution to test a hypothesis easily can involve circulat reasoning.I&#8217;m not impressed by this Lubos guy!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:14:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>Please visit the blog at 
http://npginfo.blogspot.com/
to know more about Lubos Motl knowledge physics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Please visit the blog at<br />
<a href='http://npginfo.blogspot.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://npginfo.blogspot.com/</a><br />
to know more about Lubos Motl knowledge physics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexander Putney</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-27</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:11:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-27</guid>
					<description>It very much seems as though the AIAS is producing false theories to distract the physics community pursuing the Unified Field Theory. It is however interesting that the &quot;Basic Geometrical Concepts&quot; are indeed nonsensical, immediately putting off anyone with a solid understanding of physics. As noted, the 'idiot savant' may indeed provide the breakthrough key to the Unified Field Theory by using unconventional avenues to the truth. If Evans' Generally Covariant Unified Field Theory is easily identified as a nonsensical offering by physicists, perhaps the target audience to be disinformed by the books are the independent thinkers who are not pursuing the UFT through conventional (institutional) means.

I happen to be one of these independent thinkers seeking the UFT, and I have completed a geometric model of spherical resonance based on the sacred mandalas of Sanskrit, Mayan and Tibetan cultures. For anyone interested in the possibility that the ancient understanding of sacred sound can inform the search for the unified field, my website will be up shortly. I would also like to provide my independent research papers in PDF to Chronostalker for review, as the question of human history, pyramid technologies and consciousness are inextricably intertwined with the quantum functions of 'junk' DNA.

Alexander Putney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It very much seems as though the AIAS is producing false theories to distract the physics community pursuing the Unified Field Theory. It is however interesting that the &#8220;Basic Geometrical Concepts&#8221; are indeed nonsensical, immediately putting off anyone with a solid understanding of physics. As noted, the &#8216;idiot savant&#8217; may indeed provide the breakthrough key to the Unified Field Theory by using unconventional avenues to the truth. If Evans&#8217; Generally Covariant Unified Field Theory is easily identified as a nonsensical offering by physicists, perhaps the target audience to be disinformed by the books are the independent thinkers who are not pursuing the UFT through conventional (institutional) means.</p>
	<p>I happen to be one of these independent thinkers seeking the UFT, and I have completed a geometric model of spherical resonance based on the sacred mandalas of Sanskrit, Mayan and Tibetan cultures. For anyone interested in the possibility that the ancient understanding of sacred sound can inform the search for the unified field, my website will be up shortly. I would also like to provide my independent research papers in PDF to Chronostalker for review, as the question of human history, pyramid technologies and consciousness are inextricably intertwined with the quantum functions of &#8216;junk&#8217; DNA.</p>
	<p>Alexander Putney
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G.W. Bruhn</title>
		<link>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 08:16:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/07/01/generally-covariant-unified-field-theory-myron-w-evans/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>With his comments above Mr. Felker tries to defend his master Myron W. Evans.
We should apply the old latin saying here 
&quot;Ut desint vires tamen est laudanda voluntas&quot;.
see
http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Felker-Article.html
Better Myron W. Evans himself would make a statement.
Gerhard W. Bruhn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>With his comments above Mr. Felker tries to defend his master Myron W. Evans.<br />
We should apply the old latin saying here<br />
&#8220;Ut desint vires tamen est laudanda voluntas&#8221;.<br />
see<br />
<a href='http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Felker-Article.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Felker-Article.html</a><br />
Better Myron W. Evans himself would make a statement.<br />
Gerhard W. Bruhn
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
