http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/ Philosophy, Physics and Metaphysics of Open Systems Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:29:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-68 Sun, 03 Sep 2006 01:31:15 +0100 http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-68 It would be a stretch to call Lubos Motl a genius - a nut case would be closer to the point. Just look at his review of Lee Smolins book " The Trouble With Physics" posted on his blog. His review states that it is a weird book, full of non-sense that made him very angry. And now Lubos Motl and his motley crew of cohorts will have to find a new theory of nothing, that is mathematically elegant. It would be a stretch to call Lubos Motl a genius - a nut case would be closer to the point. Just look at his review of Lee Smolins book ” The Trouble With Physics” posted on his blog. His review states that it is a weird book, full of non-sense that made him very angry. And now Lubos Motl and his motley crew of cohorts will have to find a new theory of nothing, that is mathematically elegant.

]]> http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-49 Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:48:30 +0000 http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-49 I have had similar thoughts about the Lubos, who likened me to the pope (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/12/temperatures-autocorrelation.html). He has teamed up with climate-sceptic Steve McIntyre and is apparently not very impressed by the RealClimate.org blog (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_motls_archive.html), and one of my posts on this blog prompted his response on autocorrelation. His response shows that he mixes up uncertainties associated with quantum states and non-linear chaos. He also is not able to see why using the very same data for creating models to derive a null-distribution and then use this null-distribution to test a hypothesis easily can involve circulat reasoning.I'm not impressed by this Lubos guy! I have had similar thoughts about the Lubos, who likened me to the pope (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/12/temperatures-autocorrelation.html). He has teamed up with climate-sceptic Steve McIntyre and is apparently not very impressed by the RealClimate.org blog (http://motls.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_motls_archive.html), and one of my posts on this blog prompted his response on autocorrelation. His response shows that he mixes up uncertainties associated with quantum states and non-linear chaos. He also is not able to see why using the very same data for creating models to derive a null-distribution and then use this null-distribution to test a hypothesis easily can involve circulat reasoning.I’m not impressed by this Lubos guy!

]]> http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-28 Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:14:13 +0100 http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-28 Please visit the blog at http://npginfo.blogspot.com/ to know more about Lubos Motl knowledge physics. Please visit the blog at
http://npginfo.blogspot.com/
to know more about Lubos Motl knowledge physics.

]]> http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-23 Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:39:48 +0100 http://opensys.blogsome.com/2005/06/18/lubos-motl-discovers-the-wheel/#comment-23 I draw attention to how it was acomplished in terms of the article written....what more can be said from that point? I draw attention to how it was acomplished in terms of the article written….what more can be said from that point?

]]>